Pay in installments of $62.02 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 8 - Aug 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
COMP Cams Camshaft364-425 295T H-107 T 91-602-5COMP Cams Camshafts 91 602 5 CamShaft,364 425 295T H 107 T THUMPR 91 602 5 CamShaft,364 425 295T H 107 T THUMPR BMT 227 241HFTNailhd Vehicle Fitments: Year Make Model Submodel 1957 1958 Buick Century Base 1959 1962 Buick Electra 225 1959 1966 Buick Electra Base 1966 Buick Electra Custom 1959 1964 Buick Estate Wagon Base 1965 1966 Buick Gran Sport Base 1959 1963 Buick Invicta Base 1959 1964 Buick LeSabre Base 1958 Buick Limited Base 1963 1966 Buick
COMP Cams Camshafts 91-602-5 CamShaft,364-425 295T H-107 T THUMPR 91-602-5 - CamShaft,364-425 295T H-107 T THUMPR BMT 227/241HFTNailhdVehicle Fitments:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1957 - 1958 | Buick | Century | Base |
| 1959 - 1962 | Buick | Electra | 225 |
| 1959 - 1966 | Buick | Electra | Base |
| 1966 | Buick | Electra | Custom |
| 1959 - 1964 | Buick | Estate Wagon | Base |
| 1965 - 1966 | Buick | Gran Sport | Base |
| 1959 - 1963 | Buick | Invicta | Base |
| 1959 - 1964 | Buick | LeSabre | Base |
| 1958 | Buick | Limited | Base |
| 1963 - 1966 | Buick | Riviera | Base |
| 1965 - 1966 | Buick | Riviera | Gran Sport |
| 1957 | Buick | Roadmaster | 75 |
| 1957 - 1958 | Buick | Roadmaster | Base |
| 1965 - 1966 | Buick | Skylark | Base |
| 1957 - 1958 | Buick | Special | Base |
| 1957 - 1958 | Buick | Super | Base |
| 1962 - 1966 | Buick | Wildcat | Base |
| 1965 - 1966 | Buick | Wildcat | Custom |
| 1965 | Buick | Wildcat | Deluxe |
| 1966 | Buick | Wildcat | Gran Sport |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 22 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Solid mineral SPF with light coverage effect
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I’m used to La Roche-Posay’s chemical sunscreens, so this was my first time trying their mineral version. The texture is actually quite nice for a mineral formula. It spreads evenly and doesn’t feel gritty or chalky. That said, it does take a bit longer to fully absorb compared to chemical SPFs.
I’m already very pale, and I still notice a slight white cast. It’s not extreme, but it’s there. To be fair, most mineral sunscreens tend to do this, especially those using zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.
Interestingly, on my skin it almost behaves like a very light tinted sunscreen. It slightly blurs and softens the appearance of minor blemishes and redness, which I appreciate on minimal-makeup days.
It provides broad-spectrum SPF 50 protection and feels gentle on sensitive skin. I haven’t experienced irritation, pilling, or breakouts. It layers reasonably well over moisturizer but benefits from being applied in thin, well-blended layers, which adds some time to my morning routine so it's a little inconvenient.
Overall, it’s a solid mineral option with good protection. Just expect a bit more blending time and a subtle cast.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great for pregnancy (or regular use)
Style: SPF 50, Size: 4.05 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I searched far and wide for a safe mineral-based sunscreen for pregnancy. I settled on this one and I was not disappointed. It saved my skin from a lot of sunburn this summer!
As other reviewers mentioned, it is harder to rub into the skin and can leave a whiteish tint, but that’s a small price to pay for a pregnancy-safe option.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 22, 2025
★★★★★ 1
Terrible, look like a ghost
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I love La Roche-Posay but unfortunately, I finally came across the first product I truly hate from them. This product is a complete white mask on your face and does not settle in at all. You’ll be walking around looking like a ghost all day and it gave me a mild irritation to my eyes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Leaves white cast, works okay under makeup.
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
First time using this sunscreen. I have very sensitive skin and thought since my skin tolerates their cleansers and moisturizers surely it should tolerate the sunscreen. So far so good. It’s very calming on my skin (maybe because of the zinc), but it leaves a noticeable white cast especially if you have dark skin. I wear mine under makeup and have a separate sunscreen from another brand on days where I don’t want to wear makeup. The white cast actually acts as a blank base and helps my foundation to lay well. A tip I learned from makeup artists years ago. Sunscreens that leave a white cast cancels out your natural color and acts as a corrector, concealer and foundation to lay better and look more like skin. Think of it like painting on a blank canvas. The texture is not lotion like and is actually quite thick. make sure to moisturize well before apply this sunscreen. I’ll write an update if I notice any negative issues, but so far I’m content with it because of the purpose I'm using it for.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 23, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Safe for very sensitive skin
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1), Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
It is an excellent choice, especially if you have sensitive skin or want to avoid chemical filters. Minerals such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide act by forming a barrier that reflects UV rays instead of absorbing them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2026