SKU: 72036198719

Esterel Mineralizing Gentle Hair Lotion (10x10ml) 藍盒防脫育髮精華 (每盒10支 每支10ml)

Sale price$576.00 Regular price$640.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $160.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 23 - Jul 28

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Esterel Mineralizing Gentle Hair Lotion (10x10ml) 藍盒防脫育髮精華 (每盒10支 每支10ml)Hakme's Note " BB2 " Baby (10) () () 2() (Why I picked this): (Deep Nutrition): () (Hair Structure): (Hydrolyzed Keratin) (Zero Grease): 1+1 (Power Combo): Esterel Hakme (The 2 Month Treatment): : (2 20 ): 1 & 3 : 2 () 2 & 4 : 3 () ( 2 Keep ) Hakme (Best For): () () () () (Advanced Mineralizing Lotion) Esterel (Shampoo Phyto Fortifiant Plus) (DO NOT RINSE) : () (): Paraben (Thiazolinoni) (Formaldehyde releasers) (Silicones) (Paraffins) (Acrylates) SLS

Hakme's Note 💬

"生番啲「頭髮 BB」出黎!2 個月療程,為頭皮強效施肥 🌱"

各位 Baby,如果你發覺自己甩頭髮甩到「見頭皮」、髮界越黎越闊,單靠洗頭水已經唔夠力!你需要呢盒 藍盒防脫育髮精華 (10支裝)!佢嘅概念好簡單:好似耕田咁,只要塊田 (頭皮) 有足夠營養,農作物 (頭髮) 自然會健康茁壯!跟住我嘅「2個月療程」用法,你會見到甩少咗頭髮,髮際線慢慢生番啲毛毛出黎,頭髮變得強壯唔易斷!(當然,效果快慢因人而異,亦要視乎脫髮嘅嚴重程度喔!)

點解我會選佢入舖?(Why I picked this):

強效「施肥」 (Deep Nutrition): 含有微量元素 (銅、鋅)、山毛櫸及野生酵母萃取,直接為枯竭嘅頭皮注入最需要嘅養分,提供一個有利頭髮生長嘅健康環境。
重組角蛋白 (Hair Structure): 加入水解角蛋白 (Hydrolyzed Keratin),有助修復脆弱易斷嘅髮絲,令長出黎嘅頭髮更加粗壯健康。
清爽零黏笠 (Zero Grease): 搽落頭皮最怕就係「笠」同「扁塌」。呢支精華質地似水,吸收極快,搽完吹頭頭髮依然可以保持蓬鬆,完全無負擔。
1+1 防脫組合 (Power Combo): 強烈建議配合 Esterel 防脫育髮洗頭水 一齊用!洗頭水負責「防脫止蝕」,安瓶負責「深層育髮」,雙管齊下改善頭皮健康。

Hakme 獨家用法 (The 2-Month Treatment):

💡 基本步驟: 洗頭後用毛巾印乾水份,啪開一支精華,均勻塗抹於頭皮上並輕輕按摩,無需過水。
💡 療程進度表 (2個月為一療程,共需 20 支):

第 1 & 3 星期: 每星期用 2 次 (每次用一支)。
第 2 & 4 星期: 每星期用 3 次 (每次用一支)。
(⚠️ 第二個月重複以上進度。完成 2 個月療程後,如果你覺得需要,可以繼續 Keep 住用;如果滿意效果,可以停用,相隔半年後再做一次當作保養!)

Hakme 推薦給 (Best For):

突發性/壓力脫髮 (近期突然甩好多頭髮、髮界變闊)
產後媽媽 (荷爾蒙改變引致嘅產後脫髮危機)
頭髮幼弱稀疏 (需要強韌髮絲,為毛囊補充營養)
病後/療程後修復 (需要為頭皮補充流失營養)

 


品牌官方資料

藍盒防脫育髮精華 (Advanced Mineralizing Lotion)

專為頭髮護理而設的進階礦物精華。蘊含珍貴的礦物鹽,能刺激角蛋白的產生。

當頭髮的正常礦物質水平得以恢復,髮絲便會變得強韌亮澤。此精華能與 Esterel 防脫育髮洗髮水 (Shampoo Phyto Fortifiant Plus) 產生協同效應。建議每年重複此精華護理療程兩次,能進一步加強定期使用該款洗髮水的效果。

使用方法
將整支安瓶的精華均勻塗抹於濕潤的頭髮及頭皮上。輕輕按摩。無需沖洗 (DO NOT RINSE)。

配方富含:

微量元素 (銅、鋅)

山毛櫸及野生酵母萃取

水解角蛋白

配方不含以下成分 (安全承諾):

Paraben 防腐劑
異噻唑啉酮 (Thiazolinoni)
甲醛釋放體 (Formaldehyde releasers)
矽靈 (Silicones)
石蠟 (Paraffins)
合成螯合劑
丙烯酸酯 (Acrylates)
人造色素
SLS/SLES (硫酸鹽)

意大利製造

Advanced Mineralizing Lotion

Specific mineralizing lotion for treating hair. Including the most precious mineral salts it stimulates the keratin
production.

Once its normal mineralization levels have been restored, hair gets strong and bright. This Lotion
works in synergy with the Shampoo Phyto Fortifiant Plus. Repeating the Lotion-Treating program twice yearly emphasizes the benefits of the regular use of the related shampoo.

USE INSTRUCTIONS

Distribute uniformly the ampoule content on wet hair and scalp. Massage smoothly. DO NOT RINSE.

THE INCI PRODUCT FORMULA IS ENRICHED WITH:
  • trace elements (copper, zinc) 
  • beech and wild yeast extract 
  • hydrolyzed keratin
THIS COSMETIC IS FORMULATED WITHOUT:
  • parabens 
  • thiazolinoni 
  • cessories formaldehyde 
  • silicones 
  • paraffins 
  • chelating synthesis 
  • acrylates 
  • dyes 
  • SLS/SLES

Made in Italy

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 72036198719

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 23 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
B
Verified Purchase
breezy
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Good Fit
Bought for a wedding for my husband he looked good an felt comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2025
G
Verified Purchase
Gary Darling
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 3
Didn’t last as long as I had hoped
Pants were okay for a returned item, but certainly not the best. They lasted a few months before defects got worse. Probably will convince me to just buy new all the time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2025
R
Verified Purchase
Ryan
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Best Pants I've Ever Owned!!
Size: 44W x 34L Big Tall, Color: Navy Blazer
There is not a bad thing to say about these pants. They look great (I get compliments all the time, as well as people asking for information on them), feel great, are super comfortable, and are actually quite durable. I own these in blue and gray and they are by far my favorite pants to where to work. They work for both business-casual, as well as business-formal dress-codes. Buy these pants!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2023
L
Verified Purchase
lebowitzit
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Fits Fine, Looks Great, Sizing Makes No Sense
Size: 16.5" Neck 32"-33" Sleeve, Color: White, Size: 16.5" Neck 32"-33" Sleeve, Color: White
I hate shopping for dress shirts. For me, at least, it is a thoroughly frustrating experience, mostly because there's no consistency at all to the sizing. Actually, that's not quite true: dress shirts consistently DON'T FIT ME PROPERLY, which means I have to look at a lot of shirts and scrutinize size charts - which are usually incomplete, when they're provided at all - before finally finding The One. And sometimes, like this time, I don't manage to find The One. But this shirt comes close, as I will explain. The problem stems from my physique, which I never thought of as unique, but here it is: I'm short (just under 5'4", with a 40-41" chest, a little extra weight (so my middle is about the same), a 36" waist, 33" arms when measured the traditional way (more on that later) and a 16" neck. That last measurement is the single biggest problem: most shirt manufacturers apparently think that if you have a 16' neck, you are shaped like Omar the Tentmaker. Van Heusen is no exception. Note that this shirt is listed as "fitted". Now, that's a completely amorphous descriptor, which, I suppose, is true for most shirt fit descriptors these days. But if you look at Van Heusen's "regular" fit shirts, you'll find that they think if you have a 16" neck, you must have a nearly 50" chest and your waist is over 45". That's not regular, that's freakin' portly! I was afraid to even look at any of their Big & Tall men's dress shirts -- if their idea of regular fit was this skewed, then I didn't want to know what they think Big & Tall is. Thankfully, this is a "fitted" shirt, so Van Heusen thoughtfully provides the 16" neck version with a 42-44" chest and 36-38" waist. That's the size I bought, and it actually fits me pretty well. Still a little loose for a "fitted" shirt, but it doesn't look baggy, and that's what I was after. But a little more realism in the size descriptions would be greatly appreciated. Regarding the sleeve length, I really don't know what's up. I've seen charts that tell you how to measure it, but no matter how I measure it, I never manage to come up with any of the sleeve lengths provided on size charts. I have noticed that there appear to be two ways of measuring it, though. One way, which I call the traditional way because it seems to have been around longer, starts the measurement somewhere between the edge of the shoulder and the neck. At least, I think that's where it starts -- approximately. As I said before, I never manage to come up with the same number. But by this measurement, my correct sleeve length is 32-33", and the average guy's is probably 34-35". In the last year or so, when I shopped for shirts, I found some size charts using a different method, because the numbers were a lot lower, anywhere from 22" to 28". I have no idea where they came up with that measurement, nor do I know what mine is by this method, because the shirts I ended up buying so far have all used what I referred to as the traditional method. Anyway, the shirt looked quite nice on me, right out of the package, and continues to look quite nice on me after a couple of washings. The photo I attached is what the shirt looked like after being washed twice. I wash my shirts on my machine's Delicate cycle and hang them to dry. When cared for this way, the shirt does a pretty good job of living up to the listing's claim of wrinkle resistance. It doesn't come out perfectly smooth and crisp, but it looks good enough that I don't feel inclined to iron it. I decided on a poplin shirt because I was shopping for a summer-weight shirt that would breathe well. But poplin shirts proved nonexistent in my local stores, and not all that plentiful online. Poplin shirts listed online with full size charts so I could tell whether or not they might fit me were nearly as hard to find as igloos in the Mojave Desert, and poplin shirts whose size charts indicated that they were available with dimensions that would actually fit me were somewhere between that and hen's teeth. Needless to say, I was thrilled when I found this one. But the composition of poplin appears to be open to some interpretation. I own a few poplin business shirts (which I wear without suits and ties), and upon receiving my new Van Heusen shirts, it seemed to me that my poplin business shirts were lighter and breathed better. But then it occurred to me that shirt manufacturers often treat their material with coatings that improve the luster and crispness of their shirts for display purposes, and such coatings might be why my new shirts felt stiff, heavy and not particularly airy. Not wanting to give up and send the new shirts back, I decided to take a risk and launder them to see if that improved the feel. Thankfully, it did. After two washings, my new shirts are less shiny than delivered (which I'm fine with), a lot less stiff and breathe reasonably well. So... these shirts fit well, look good and feel good. Check, check and check. That means I'm fully satisfied with them, right? Wrong -- I am NOT fully satisfied with them. It's summertime. Summertime where I live is hot and often quite humid. I wanted shirts appropriate for that weather. To me, that has always meant lightweight broadcloth short-sleeve shirts. But it seems that today's Fashion Police have decreed that there is no longer such a thing as a short-sleeve dress shirt. They have decreed that today's well-dressed men must wear heavy cotton, long-sleeve shirts year-round. Well, excuse me for living, but some of us perspire when dressed that way in summer heat. Poplin shirts were presented to me as the compromise between acceptable modern fashion and comfort. Linen shirts were also recommended, but I couldn't find a single linen shirt what didn't have a crinkly, casual finish, much less one that was intended to be worn with a tie. With extreme effort, I found a poplin shirt that fits well, and I bought two of them, but while they are more comfortable in the sticky summer heat than heavy cotton, they are NOT as comfortable as my old short-sleeve dress shirts. I want new short-sleeve dress shirts, dagnab it! But until I successfully identify and locate all those insane Fashion Police, blow up their air conditioners and confine them to a Chicago Summer Simulator (otherwise known as a sauna) for three days in their heavy cotton shirts so that they will once again bless the manufacture of short-sleeve dress shirts, I guess these Van Heusen fitted long-sleeve poplin shirts will have to do.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 30, 2024
T
Verified Purchase
Tom McCartney
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Great quality and true to size labeled.
Size: 16.5" Neck 32"-33" Sleeve, Color: White
Top quality shirt at a great price. Sleeve and neck size true to as labeled. Material lightweight, which is perfect. I could not be happier with this purchase.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2026

recommand products