Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 14 - Jul 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Whirlpool 惠而浦 MV831S 71厘米 易拆式抽油煙機900 MV831S ( )900 : 13A 2 ( ) 40W x 1 152 6 ( x x )200 x 710 x 548 7. 9 x 28. 0 x 21. 5 14. 5 1
主要特點
- 強力排風效能： 擁有高達每小時900立方米的排風量，並提供高/低兩段風速選擇，能迅速有效地清除濃烈油煙。
- 易拆式設計： 導油式機身配合中央油杯，結構簡單，方便用戶輕鬆拆卸及清洗，時刻保持機身潔淨。
- 靈活安裝選項： 提供多面排風選擇，可根據不同廚房的佈局及安裝環境，靈活設置排風方向。
- 耐用不銹鋼機身： 機身以不銹鋼製造，外型時尚，防銹耐用，能輕易融入各種廚房設計風格。
- 獨立照明系統： 配備獨立燈膽，為煮食範圍提供充足光線，操作更安全方便。
產品規格
- 型號：MV831S
- 類型：易拆式抽油煙機
- 顏色：不銹鋼
- 排風量 (立方米/小時)：900
- 電源接頭: 13A
- 風扇摩打速度選擇：2段 (高/低)
- 照明：40W x 1
- 排風喉直徑：152毫米 / 6吋
- 油杯：中央易拆式油杯
- 機身體積 (高 x 闊 x 深)：200 x 710 x 548 毫米 / 7.9 x 28.0 x 21.5 吋
- 淨重：14.5公斤
- 產地：台灣
- 保養：1 年
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 81 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Fits good just needs a light ironing.
Good fit with a casual look. These are a nice fit with an almost slim fit width at the bottom. I am a short guy and the 34x28 size fit me great. As I obviously don't have a trim waistline, I like that the bottom of these are narrower than a more dressier pant. The waist of my pants tend to move up and down approx. an inch to inch and a half and slacks tend to get under the heel of the less clunky modern dress casual shoe. Comparison below.
Amazon Essentials 34x28 were a lot tighter (like a 32)in the waist and the length seemed loo long.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 17, 2018
★★★★★ 5
good value
Size: 40W x 28L, Color: Brown
Top quality, very comfortable, soft fabric, I like them very much.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Functional pants, safe bed, accurate color.
Size: 34W x 32L, Color: Dark Olive, Size: 34W x 32L, Color: Dark Olive
I think these pants are very functional, the color is very accurate, the fit is good, I think it is a very safe choice for someone looking for safe pick.
I have not tried washing them so i am not sure about wrinkle resistance, I may update my review later. But out of the box, they were not wrinkled.
Thickness is decent, not too thick or thin.
Since I got it for some discount, the value was good.
The image is in yellow lighting.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great fit
Size: 38W x 29L, Color: Black
Bought for a friend He loves them Fit well
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2026
★★★★★ 3
You get what you pay for.
I have 4 pairs of these pants. Originally, I gave them a five star review because the fit was perfect, they are comfortable, and looked nice. I have worn them several times and they seemed to be well made.
However, I've changed my rating to three stars. I've washed 3 of the 4 pairs I bought. The black pair came out o.k.. The olive and grey pairs are not color fast. The olive pair faded considerably in the wash and has a definite brown tinge to it in the thighs and knees. The grey pair did not fade as much, but you can also see that brown tinge in the thighs and knees. I can still wear them as work pants, but I was disappointed. I have also noticed that the inside of the front pockets have excessive wear.
The bottom line is that these pants do not cost much, but will probably not last long. Are they worth $30? Personally, I'd rather pay more and get better quality. I had put several other Goodthreads items on my wishlist, but now I'm rethinking that.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 31, 2020