SKU: 90150470548

SuperX Lab71

Sale price$7424.55 Regular price$8249.50
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $2062.38 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 29 - Aug 3

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

SuperX Lab71The legendary SuperX is BACK, reborn as a stripped down, souped up, pure gravel race machinepurpose built for chasing podiums and PRs everywhere from Kansas to the local lunch ride world championships. Its predecessor, the SuperSix EVO SE, set the fastest time ever for Unbound Gravel in 2024, and with the new SuperX, weve gone all in to make it even faster. Less aero drag. More fatigue fighting compliance. Sleeker integration, and of course, less

The legendary SuperX is BACK, reborn as a stripped down, souped up, pure gravel race machine—purpose-built for chasing podiums and PRs everywhere from Kansas to the local lunch-ride world championships. Its predecessor, the SuperSix EVO SE, set the fastest time ever for Unbound Gravel in 2024, and with the new SuperX, we’ve gone all in to make it even faster. Less aero drag. More fatigue-fighting compliance. Sleeker integration, and of course, less weight. Ready for faster?

Made to absolutely smash gravel races. Simple as that. This is full-gas road race performance engineered for the full thrash world of gravel. Elbows out, head down, get off the front and don’t look back. SuperX only has one destination – the top step.

FEATURES:

  • Fast & Light: Our KOM-winning road tech meets Unbound-winning engineering. The LAB71 SuperX is super aero and over 100 grams lighter than its predecessor, helping you stay ahead of the pack in this rapidly -evolving era of highspeed, elbow-to-elbow gravel racing. With gravel race speeds averaging well over 35 km/h, the LAB71 SuperX brings a whole lotta free speed over any distance.
  • Gravel Glider, Not Grinder: SuperX’s sophisticated carbon construction smooths out the rough, floating above the gravel to keep you cranking. Specially constructed flex zones in the seat tube, rear triangle, and top tube work as a system with the D-shaped seatpost to absorb shock and vibration, keeping your mind and body fresher longer.
  • Built to Take It. Tuned for You: SuperX’s Proportional Response carbon construction is tailor made for gravel racing and for you. Fully customized by size, precisely oriented layers of different types and moduli of carbon fibers deliver an ideal balance of weight, stiffness and durability for every rider. All backed by our lifetime guarantee.
  • Get 'Crossed Up: Is cyclocross your thing? SuperX has you covered. Throw on some 33c tires and hit it. With its straight-line speed, planted handling, and massive mud clearance, SuperX loves to battle it out between the tape. Oh, and the flat top tube is pretty nice on the shoulders too.
  • Rolling Fatties: Courses vary, terrain varies, weather varies. The SuperX fits tires up to 48mm for the frame and 51mm for the fork, with at least 4mm clearance on each side, ready for whatever tire the day demands. 
  • Delta Steerer: The Delta steerer design is great for gravel racing. It allows for clean cable integration from the cockpit into the frame, and a reduced frontal area for increased aero efficiency.
  • OutFront Geometry: OutFront pairs a slack head angle with a longer-than-normal 55mm fork offset, increasing stability and control on the steep and loose – while maintaining the snappy handling you need for quick  line changes and last-second corrections.
  • The Cover Up: A slick cover hides SuperX’s top tube bag mount. It's there when you want it, invisible when you don’t.
  • D-Lightful: The D-shaped design of SuperX’s seatpost enhances aerodynamics and boosts vertical compliance, reducing muscle fatigue so you stay fresh and fast for the final sprint.

SPECS:

Frame Lab71 SuperX, Series 0 carbon construction, Proportional Response construction, internal cable routing, 12x142mm thru-axle, UDH BSA 68mm threaded BB, flat mount disc, integrated seatpost binder
Fork Lab71 SuperX, Series 0 carbon construction, integrated crown race, 12x100mm thru-axle, flat mount disc, internal routing, 1-1/8" to 1-1/2" Delta steerer, 55mm offset
Rims/Wheels Reserve 40|44 GR, Carbon, Turbulent Aero tech, 24h, tubeless ready
Hubs (F) DT Swiss 180, 12x100mm centerlock / (R) DT Swiss 180, 12x142mm centerlock
Spokes Sapim CX-Ray Aero straight pull
Tires Vittoria Terreno T50, 700x40c, tubeless ready
Crankset SRAM RED XPLR AXS Power Meter, 40T
Chainrings 40t
Bottom Bracket CeramicSpeed DUB BSA
Chain SRAM RED, 13-speed
Front Derailleur N/A
Rear Derailleur SRAM RED XPLR AXS
Cassette/Rear Cogs
SRAM RED XPLR, 10-46, 13-speed
Shifters SRAM RED AXS, 13-speed
Handlebars Cannondale SystemBar R-One - low drag, full carbon integrated bar/stem, internal routing
Stem Cannondale SystemBar R-One - low drag, full carbon integrated bar/stem, internal routing
Brakes SRAM RED AXS, Paceline X 160/160mm rotors
Pedals Sold Separtely
Saddle Fizik Vento Antares 00, carbon rail, 140mm
Seat Post Cannondale C1 Aero 27 Carbon, SmartSense compatible, 0mm offset (46cm), 20mm offset (51-61cm)
Extras Cannondale C1 Aero 27 Carbon, SmartSense compatible, 0mm offset (46cm), 20mm offset (51-61cm)

 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 90150470548

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 26 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
P
Verified Purchase
P. Meltzer
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
What is better? The overachieving 6 or underachieving 8?
Format: Hardcover
First, let me say that I thought that this was an excellent book and would recommend it to anyone who is at all interested in the college admissions process. Second, I was surprised at how many of the reviewers seemed shocked--shocked!--that applicants got bonus points for coming from minority backgrounds. Was this some kind of revelation? However one thing that surprised me a little bit is how--even moving beyond race entirely--the more advantages you have had in life, the more disadvantageous it will be for your admissions process. For example, I was unaware that having successful parents would be, in essence, held against you on the theory that more would be expected of you. While other reviewers have (jokingly?) said that they would advise their white kids not to check the "Caucasian" box, I might advise my (still very young) kids to say that their parents have been unemployed their whole life. I suppose that the main issue which this whole process really boils down to is the following: As a college applicant, is it more important to succeed in life relative to the world around you (i.e. relative to your classmates, to others of your race, to others of your geographical area, to your own parents' life and accomplishments, etc.) or is it more important to succeed absolutely and not on a relative scale. This book clearly informs us that the answer is the former and not the latter. Whether that should be the answer is another question. For example, say that a student's entire life could be distilled into 2 numbers each on a sliding scale from 1-10. The first number is simply your academic performance (grades, SAT's, course load, etc.) The second number is your background (race, economic circumstances, gender, etc.) In the case of Wesleyan, it seems clear to me that they would rather have a student whose first number was, say, a 6 if his or her second was a 2 (take Mig for example in Steinberg's book) than a student whose first number was an 8 if the second number was a 9 or 10 (take Tiffany Wang for example). Whether that is the right approach is certainly a legitimate issue for discusion and I'm not saying that it's not. I suppose that one of the things that would be interesting to know (even though one never really can know of course) is whether those numbers will change in the future. For example, if one were to know that Mig would always be a 6 and Tiffany would always be an 8, would that change the analysis as to which is the right approach? I suspect that part of the reason that a school like Wesleyan would favor the overachieving 6 over the underachieving 8 is due to the hope or expectation that those trends will continue in the future and that one day the 6 will actually be ahead of the 8. And maybe that's the way it works. Who knows.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2003
J
Verified Purchase
Jeremy W.
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
You will find out how a selective private college evaluate and admit students
Format: Paperback
I'm a high school counselor and college advisor. Fifteen years ago when I started my college counseling position, I struggled to understand or explain to students and their parents how a selective private college evaluate and admit students. It was this book that helped me understand the essence of selective private college admissions. Compared to other dry theory books, this book tells the admissions practice as stories that are easy to read, understand, and associate with. I highly recommend this book to students, parents, and new counselors.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2024
M
Verified Purchase
M. Tucker
Boise, US
★★★★★ 3
Who edited this mess?!?!?!?
Format: Kindle
This is a very interesting work of nonfiction. I found it intriguing and read it very quickly. I actually got invested in these students and their stories and their journey to get admitted to the college that was right for them. BUT, and this is a big but, this book is so poorly edited, it is disgraceful! If a person were reading this for research purposes, and it could be useful for just that, good luck to them. The dates are all over the place. At one point, the kids are being considered for the class of 2004, then it makes a reference to the current year as 2000, then it reverts back to 2004 for a long while, then it mentions how the kids--currently at their various chosen colleges--reacted to the events of 9/11/01. What the hell? It's very confusing. It makes it very difficult to keep things in context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2013
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Abundant information but needs update
Format: Kindle
I struggled a little when try to decide how many star to give. It's an excellent book and very informative. It feels like I was not reading a college admission advisory book, which very often are dry and mechanical. It feels like reading stories of students and AOs, I got attached and involved emotionally, and really felt for them. But there were abundant information in the book, I was able to use the book to answer most my questions. If you need a list of YESs, Nos, Warnings..., then this is not the book for you. If you need to know what happens during admission process, then this is an excellent book for you. Based on the information in this book, I was able to extract my own conclusions. The reason I hesitated if I should rate this book as a five stars book is how long ago it was written. A lot has changed. Many aspects stayed same, but many aspects changed. It will be misleading if this is the only guide book you are using. Wish everyone a great college application season.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 12, 2015
K
Verified Purchase
Kajetan
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 4
An intimidating read
Format: Paperback
This is a scary book to read if you are anyone, but most especially a Parent of a college bound junior or senior. The writer, Jacques Steinberg, a NY Times Reporter writes beautifully and captures the college application process in an authentic way, without overdramatization. His style and sensibility reminds me of Jon Kraukeur. I was prinicipally struck by the heroic Sisyphean efforts of the admissions office and the immense gap between public school and private school admissions counseling at the high school level, a gap which is even greater today. This is also a very good description of Wesleyan University -- what it is not so good at, and this is no fault of the author who tries to make this point and the related one that follows , but the best approach for the applicant is to find a college where he and she can thrive and trust the process, the admissions folks are very dedicated to bringing in students who can add value and to whom they can add value -- more to the point when a good fit is made, all the effort and anxiety is well worthwhile to the school and the applicant. good luck and best wishes to all of you who are college bound.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 9, 2012

recommand products