SKU: 51050483562

Sericho Pallasite Meteorite Part Slice, 92.48g, Etched and Stabilized

Sale price$292.50 Regular price$325.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $81.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 8 - Aug 13

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Sericho Pallasite Meteorite Part Slice, 92.48g, Etched and StabilizedProfessionally conserved pallasite from Kenya's Habaswein find This 92. 48g part slice exposes the internal architecture of the Sericho pallasite through controlled etching that reveals both the iron nickel matrix structure and the boundaries between metal and olivine crystal phases. The specimen has been stabilized using museum standard conservation methods: Paraloid B 72 applied to cut edges and microcrystalline wax on polished faces. This treatment

Professionally conserved pallasite from Kenya's Habaswein find

This 92.48g part slice exposes the internal architecture of the Sericho pallasite through controlled etching that reveals both the iron-nickel matrix structure and the boundaries between metal and olivine crystal phases. The specimen has been stabilized using museum-standard conservation methods: Paraloid B-72 applied to cut edges and microcrystalline wax on polished faces. This treatment preserves the meteorite's structural integrity without adding epoxy weight, ensuring the listed 92.48g represents actual meteorite mass. The part slice format displays a cross-section through the stony-iron structure, showing how olivine crystals are distributed within the metallic host.

The etching process employed nitric acid to preferentially dissolve kamacite and taenite at different rates, creating visible topographic relief that maps the metal's crystallographic orientation. Olivine crystals appear as recessed or protruding features depending on their hardness relative to the surrounding metal. The stabilization prevents oxidation and maintains the contrast between etched metal surfaces and silicate phases, critical for long-term display and study.

Structure and features

The etched surface displays the iron-nickel matrix with visible kamacite-taenite boundaries that formed during slow cooling in the asteroid's interior. Olivine crystals appear as distinct phases embedded within the metallic framework, their margins defined by the differential etching response between silicate and metal. The part slice geometry cuts through multiple olivine grains at varying angles, creating a three-dimensional view of how these gem-quality crystals occupied space within the parent body's core-mantle boundary region.

Kamacite lamellae width and orientation vary across the specimen, reflecting the nickel concentration gradients that developed during the asteroid's thermal history. Some olivine crystals show fracture patterns consistent with impact shock, while others remain intact with sharp crystal faces preserved at the metal-silicate interface. The stabilization treatment has locked these features in place, preventing the oxidation that typically degrades iron meteorites in terrestrial environments.

Scientific context

Pallasites formed at the boundary between a differentiated asteroid's metallic core and olivine-rich mantle, likely through impact disruption that mixed these layers during the solar system's first few million years. The Sericho fall represents one of the most significant pallasite recoveries, with material showing exceptional preservation of both metal and silicate phases. Olivine crystals in pallasites provide direct samples of mantle material from asteroids that underwent the same planetary differentiation processes that created Earth's internal structure.

The iron-nickel host crystallized from molten metal at temperatures above 1400°C, then cooled at rates between 1 and 10 degrees Celsius per million years. This extended cooling period allowed nickel atoms to diffuse through the crystal lattice, creating the kamacite-taenite intergrowths visible after etching. Pallasites account for less than 1% of all classified meteorites, making them among the rarest samples available from asteroid interiors. For comprehensive background on meteorite formation and classification, see our Learn About Meteorites guide.

Frequently asked questions

Is this meteorite authenticated? Sericho is classified as a pallasite in the Meteoritical Bulletin. You can verify the classification at this MetBull search link. Each specimen includes a certificate of authenticity documenting its provenance from the 2016 Habaswein, Kenya find.

What does "stabilized" mean for this specimen? Stabilization refers to museum-standard conservation treatment using Paraloid B-72 acrylic resin on cut edges and microcrystalline wax on polished surfaces. This prevents oxidation without adding significant weight. Unlike specimens coated in thick epoxy, this piece's 92.48g weight represents actual meteorite mass, not resin filler.

What is included with this specimen? The specimen weighs 92.48g and includes a certificate of authenticity. No display stand is included unless specifically noted in the variant details.

Why do pallasites show such distinct crystal and metal separation? The olivine crystals and iron-nickel metal represent two immiscible materials that could not mix when molten. They originated at the boundary where the asteroid's liquid metal core contacted its solid olivine mantle, either through impact disruption or density-driven flow processes.

How should I store this etched and stabilized piece? The conservation treatment provides long-term protection, but store the specimen in low-humidity conditions away from direct moisture exposure. The stabilization prevents oxidation under normal display conditions, though extreme humidity or liquid water contact should be avoided.

Collector significance

Pallasites represent the rarest structural class among meteorites, and Sericho material combines scientific importance with exceptional visual clarity. The 2016 discovery provided the first significant pallasite material in over a decade, and specimens with professional stabilization treatment offer preservation quality typically reserved for institutional collections. This 92.48g part slice provides substantial size for display while maintaining the internal structure visibility that makes pallasites valuable for both collectors and researchers.

The etched and stabilized preparation demonstrates proper conservation methodology, distinguishing this specimen from untreated pieces that deteriorate over time or epoxy-coated examples that obscure actual meteorite content. Collectors seeking stony-iron meteorites value Sericho for its combination of structural clarity, gem-quality olivine, and reliable provenance from a documented find. Browse our complete Stony-Iron Meteorites collection to compare this specimen with other core-mantle boundary samples.

Meteoritical Bulletin entry: Sericho | Classification: Pallasite | Find, Habaswein, Kenya, 2016

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 51050483562

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 28 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
F
Verified Purchase
Fnord Fjamily
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Essential Commentary, I Use it Every Time
Format: Hardcover
I won't write an exhaustive review, but I can easily commend this commentary to any seminary student by saying this: it goes into my pile of reference books for nearly every paper I write, on any subject. It's always relevant. If I'm dealing with any New Testament text, it's worth looking up in this commentary to see if it has an OT basis, if it's an allusion, a quote, or something similar. This adds dimensionality and thoroughness to my treatment of the NT, putting it in perspective. There is a similar volume, which I use just as often, called 'Commentary on the Old Testament Use of the Old Testament.' For OT studies, I use it along with 'The Context of Scripture' (which is basically ANET with cross-indexed biblical passages and ancient texts). There have been a few times when I've followed the chain all the way from NT text -> NT use of OT -> OT text -> OT use of OT -> Context of Scripture. If you're a Bible nerd, you can imagine this is basically cause to run around the neighborhood six times shouting 'Hallelujah' while the neighbors scratch their heads or close their blinds. I use this book as much as NICNT for NT studies, which is to say, any time I study the NT. This commentary is amazing, it earns its footprint on my booksehelf. Absolutely recommend it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 1, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Brian
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
A much needed resource!
Format: Hardcover
A phenomenal and much needed resources for the church today! I am delighted that it is now part of my theological library.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2026
I
Verified Purchase
InHisHand
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Pastoral Use of Beale's and Carson's Commentary
Format: Hardcover
This book was properly NOT entitled "Commentary on the New Testament Exegesis of the Old Testament." It is a well studied and scholarly look at how the New Testament writers made USE of the Old Testament Scriptures. And they did make use of those Scriptures is varied and instructive ways. Beale and Carson have compiled and edited articles from numerous trustworthy believing scholars which explain where, how, and why specific passages of Old Testament texts were employed by NT authors. These articles are careful to cite OT and NT contexts, predominant Middle Eastern scholastic thought prior to the 1st Century, and provide an analysis of what style was likely being used by the NT author (for example: typology, compare / contrast, poetic / emotive, prophetic fulfillment, simile, and at times even exegetical / interpretive). Such varied approaches by the NT authors to acquiring and working with OT passages begs the question of whether we ought to handle the OT in the same manner as did they. This commentary fairly well states that the answer is, "Yes...but." Yes, if we were to be as careful as they in understanding that we are not always merely quoting and interpreting the OT nor making absurd allegories of the OT texts but using them as instructive examples, poetic bursts of emotion, and historical typographic illustrations then we should indeed use the OT in the same way. Often the articles and entries in the commentary are long. This is not a dictionary and does not lend itself to quick reference lookups. Such attention to detail and depth enhances the experience of using this volume as it unearths elements and aspects of the Old Testament references that we rarely attempt to see from a 1st Century perspective today. Its overall format is rather straightforward. Identify a NT passage and look it up in the commentary in the passage's traditional Protestant biblical order. Generally only OT passages that are directly quoted, paraphrased, alluded to, or cited by the NT are expanded upon in the commentary. If an OT passage is merely somewhat similar to or has only surface resemblances with an OT passage (giving one the feeling that it is being brought to mind for evocative or emotive reasons alone) then the commentary may not touch on it. In general this is a very useful collection of articles. Its heart is not on being a commentary on the entire New Testament but is focused most narrowly on how the New Testament writers put the Old Testament to work to illustrate Jesus as the Christ, the evils of rebellion and sin, and the complex intricacies of God's epic sweeping salvific plan for humanity.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 28, 2012
S
Verified Purchase
Shane
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 4
Good, But Realize Its Limits
Format: Hardcover
I agree with the other reviewers who spoke highly of this resource. It is a fine resource for NT studies. However, realize that it isn't really a commentary like most of us are used to (in my opinion, the title is a little misleading). Rather, it is only a commentary on the NT texts that clearly quote OT texts. The book does not comment on entire NT books, but only some select verses. For example, I used this book studying Mark and it only discussed around 30 phrases from the Gospel of Mark - those verses in Mark that are clear OT citations. I wasn't able to use it in Mark studies as much as I had hoped. I realize this is what the book is supposed to do, and it does it very well. Just remember it won't be useful for NT texts that aren't OT quotes. This isn't a critique, just an observation for those interested. You won't be able to use this resource all the time, but it's helpful for those NT texts where an OT citation is found. FYI, I gave it 4 stars instead of 5 because the citations in the articles are not footnotes, but contained in the articles themselves [It looks like this: (eg. R.P. Martin 1974: 97; O'Brien 1982: 151; Hubner 1997a: 91; Gnilka 1980: 168; Barth and Blanke 1994:357, etc.)]. Some citations are very lengthy, which makes it quite cumbersome to read at times. Also, this is subjective I suppose, but I didn't like the font at all (it seemed too tight). All in all, this is a good book for what it does - just realize what it does before you buy it and you won't be disappointed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2013
E
Verified Purchase
Eric Stampher
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Can't ask for more, but I want more.
Format: Hardcover
Really, this is just a start. Any commentary is. But this is one of the best because it proceeds from a radical premise: the whole Bible is from God, giving His point of view and superceding that of the human author. Not that this is promoted self-consciously or consistently from each contributor. But the structure of the enterprise is such that they are sucked back into presenting how it is that the old testament is so thoroughly imbued in NT writings, including in ways which both OT and NT writers could not have intended. Treading down this path forces us to question all those teachings we've had where we were told: "Matthew (or Paul or John ...) here had in mind xyz." When Matthew wrote his gospel, we might now surmise that we can't be sure what he himself had in mind, because what we wrote was superintended to the degree that Matthew's sinful thoughts were NOT what ended up on parchment. God's thoughts are there, pure and untainted by Matthew's natural limitations and sin. Attempts to work from Matthew's sinful thoughts and culture to God's meaning miss the point that whatever Matthew was in his head was NOT the end product that flowed out his quill. Remember when Caiaphas spoke what he thought naturally about how it is better for one man to die rather than the whole nation take a hit? He meant it for evil, but God superintended it to be ultimate truth, regardless of that speaker's intent. Same with all holy writings. Yes, holy men of old spake as they were moved, but their holiness does not naturally come out in uncontaminated speech -- that takes a special work of God. This commentary allows for that premise. There's something way more than human going on that ties this whole Bible together in one theme from one Writer. Don't get me wrong, not all these contributors seem to subscribe to my radical conclusions above, although I think the editors do. And their prescribed structure for this commentary nudge the contributors into a path that I think leads to a more theocentric authorship. So this is a good start, but nothing beats trying to read the Bible itself from God's point of view, rather than the hallowed and misguided grammatial-historical human focused approach.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2008

recommand products