SKU: 80006580969

BMR 64-72 A-Body Non-Adj. Lower A-Arms (Polyurethane) - Red

Sale price$257.85 Regular price$286.50
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $71.62 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 5 - Aug 10

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

BMR 64-72 A-Body Non-Adj. Lower A-Arms (Polyurethane) - RedFits 1964 1972 GM A Bodies; Manufactured from heavy duty 1. 5 inch, 0. 095 inch wall and 1. 625 inch, 0. 120 inch wall DOM tubing; Laser cut, CNC formed steel plate braces; Greaseable, 95 durometer polyurethane bushings; Preassembled with new ball joints and polyurethane bump stops; Non adjustable; Eliminates lower A arm deflection; Improves steering feel and response for normal and performance driving; Available in red or black hammertone powder coat

Fits 1964-1972 GM A-Bodies;Manufactured from heavy-duty 1.5-inch, 0.095-inch wall and 1.625-inch, 0.120-inch wall DOM tubing;Laser-cut, CNC-formed steel plate braces;Greaseable, 95-durometer polyurethane bushings;Preassembled with new ball joints and polyurethane bump stops;Non-adjustable;Eliminates lower A-arm deflection;Improves steering feel and response for normal and performance driving;Available in red or black hammertone powder coat for long lasting good looks;3-4 hour installation time;Proudly designed in the USA!;Proudly made in the USA!

Application Guide

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
1965-1967 Buick Gran Sport Base
1970,1972 Buick Skylark 350
1964-1972 Buick Skylark Base
1968-1972 Buick Skylark Custom
1967-1968 Chevrolet Chevelle 300
1967-1969 Chevrolet Chevelle 300 Deluxe
1970-1972 Chevrolet Chevelle Base
1967-1972 Chevrolet Chevelle Concours
1969-1972 Chevrolet Chevelle Concours Estate
1969-1972 Chevrolet Chevelle Greenbrier
1968-1972 Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu
1968-1972 Chevrolet Chevelle Nomad
1971-1972 Chevrolet Chevelle SS
1964-1972 Chevrolet El Camino Base
1968-1972 Chevrolet El Camino Custom
1968-1972 Chevrolet El Camino SS
1970-1972 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Base
1964-1971 Oldsmobile 442 Base
1964-1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass Base
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cruiser
1964-1967 Oldsmobile Cutlass Holiday
1968,1971-1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass S
1967 Oldsmobile Cutlass Turnpike Cruiser
1964-1972 Pontiac GTO Base
1970-1971 Pontiac GTO The Judge
1964-1972 Pontiac LeMans Base
1972 Pontiac LeMans Luxury
1969-1970 Pontiac LeMans Safari
1970-1972 Pontiac LeMans Sport
1971 Pontiac LeMans T37
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 80006580969

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
Kallie
Draper, US
★★★★★ 3
Janky
These are very cheaply made and barely stay on. The clasp to keep the diapers closed breaks half of the time when I'm trying to put a fresh diaper on. Won't be buying these again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 30, 2023
C
Charlotte
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Works Well
These diapers fit well right now, but like any diaper, we will be watching the weight of the baby and move up a size as the weight limit gets close, as that affects the amount of leakage that can occur. They are thin and easy to fit in a small diaper bag that goes anywhere, yet they are also absorbent. The designs are cute, and I like that it has a wetness indicator on the outside. They are absorbent for a few hours, but I wouldn't trust them for more than 4 hours because they are thin; however, that's the negative of any thinner diaper on the market, at least that's what I've found. The baby doesn't suffer from any irritation on his sensitive skin, which is also a big plus and is a necessity, as far as I'm concerned.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2022
B
Verified Purchase
BandC928
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 1
I've used babyganics for two children and will never buy again
I've used babyganics diapers for years and have always loved them. They used to be soft, incredibly absorbent and with a minimalist design that didn't show through light colored baby clothes. They were the diapers I recommended to everyone as a cloth diaper alternative and I was willing to pay the extra $ for them. What happened?!?! These have a brightly colored yet faded appearing design on them, they are rough and they constantly leak (like EVERY time). They are also small! I sized up one as I always used to do with babyganics but these size 2 diapers for 12-18 lb babies barely fit my 10 lb baby. I switched to Millie Moon diapers and find them a million times better. They're everything babyganics used to be.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2022
W
Webb
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Natural and Soft
Fun colorful patterns that are great for boys and girls and are soft to the touch. They are thin when dry which is great, but they still hold a lot. They have worked great well overnight with zero leaks and the baby stays dry. Fit is snug but not too tight and they move well with baby! Overall very happy with the "Babyganics, Absorbent, Breathable, Triple Dry Protection Diapers".
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 12, 2022
G
Verified Purchase
giovanna
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 4
Still pretty good
We had their “old version” - different pattern and also apparently a different material? Because these don’t seem as good quality. But they are still more absorbent than most
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2023

recommand products